Sacred:Inner Works of Resistances, Translation of a German thread by Librarian

From SacredWiki
Revision as of 16:41, 24 October 2007 by Erialc (talk | contribs) (New page: {{guide}} Posted at [http://www.darkmatters.org Darkmatters]for review and discussion == '''Inner works of resistances''' == [Original article in German by Covenant for inSacred.de, tra...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Posted at Darkmattersfor review and discussion

Inner works of resistances

[Original article in German by Covenant for inSacred.de, translated by Librarian]

Foreward

[color=blue]Something need to be said here.

I tried to contact the original writer of the article but have not received any response. Many things could have went wrong of course. For one, maybe he doesn't understand English and had no idea what I'm ask him for. wink.gif Its more likely that he has moved on like Librarian.

Still I decided to post it because Librarian has gotten permission for the translation, and I have not modified a single word on this (just some formatting and minor organizing). That said, if anyone has a valid reason for me to remove this, I will do so.


With that out of the way, a little thought from me:

I always liked this short but very useful article on resistances, namely the explanation of how mono-elemental is significantly more powerful than multi-elemental. (And how it still makes sense even though I use a not so good translator to help me read the German)

As far as I know, this has never laned on the international side of the forum. And well among the things Librarian gave me, there is a translation of the article, which is still valid.

As always, questions and comments are welcome.

Myles[/color]


There's a modest formula in the "official" strategy guide from Ascaron:

[center]Received Damage =[/center] [center]phys.dam*{phys.dam/(phys.dam + phys.res)}[/center] [center]+fire.dam*{...}+mag.dam{...}+pois.dam{...}[/center]